AI for developers: assistants, agents and the review that follows
A coding assistant that writes a function in four seconds is only useful if the function passes review, passes tests and doesn't quietly add a dependency nobody asked for. We judge developer tools on that standard.
This section covers code assistants, agent frameworks, model APIs, evaluation and cost. We look at what a tool can read in your repository, what it sends to a vendor, and how its changes show up in a diff you can actually review.
Agents get extra scrutiny. An agent that runs ten steps on its own can make ten mistakes on its own, so we always ask where the checkpoints are.
Next on the list: getting started with AI for developers, and beginner advice for teams adding an assistant to code review.
Filed here
Nothing filed under AI for Developers yet. Until the first piece lands, the wire below tracks what changed this week.
This week from AI - Ars Technica
- US arrests tech CEO accused of smuggling $300M in Nvidia chips into ChinaAI - Ars Technica
- The 7-year-old Nvidia Shield TV is now $100 more expensive due to AIAI - Ars Technica
- Judge dismisses Chegg and Penske antitrust lawsuits targeting Google AI searchAI - Ars Technica
- With most information hidden, the game Stratego had stumped AI—until nowAI - Ars Technica
- Google announces Gemini 4 Argon AI model, but you can't use it yetAI - Ars Technica
- RFK Jr. thinks AI will free us from the "tyranny" of medical facts, expertiseAI - Ars Technica